wow! the comments are more exciting than the blog!!

from chiatilik's blog....phew!! sizzling!!
8 Comments »
Dear All Readers,

Do you really need a leader like Chia Ti Lik leading Singapore? A womaniser leader? I was once his regular chatting mate in MSN and he did admit that he had an affair with a client age 30+ in his office. I guessed it was JaslynGo.
Yes, it might be his rights as a human being but we are given a brain to think as a human being. Sad to say he never use his brain wisely to think.
He admit to me, he love Jaslyn in our recent chat but why he need to do it secretly and hurts his wife (Michelle Yan) feelings and also Jaslyn’s husband at the 1st place?
Why all the secrecy relationship?
If both of them no longer love their partners, why not be frank to them?
Think fellow Singaporean, if he can cheat his love ones he can even cheat us.
ONCE AGAIN, PLEASE BOYCOTT CHIA TI LIK!!!

Comment by nfirdaus | May 24, 2008

A fine post once again and please boycott Firdaus for spreading such shameless vicious slander.

Comment by phew! | May 24, 2008

In his sms sent to me on 23/12/2007 645pm thru hp number +6594508***
” I just fucked a pretty girl last week. What Can you offer me? Have you tasted and entered a good wet cibai before?”

and at 742pm he added somemore. ” The girl enjoyed it alot la. Very pretty somemore. For me easy with women”

Comment by nfirdaus | May 25, 2008

His latest sms dated 25/5/2008 0805pm “You are an Idiot. I want you to make unreserved apology on my blog”
Firdaus : Why should I apologise? those statement was nothing but the truth. Every opposition political activist should boycott him. We do not need such leader in opposition.

Comment by nfirdaus | May 25, 2008

Dear phew!

I saw your blog. I can see that it is so well done. I am very much impressed. My blog pales in comparison i wonder if you can give me some pointers in time to come

Cheers.

Ti Lik

Comment by chiatilik | May 25, 2008

You sound bitter.
Are you falling into the trap of “opposing for the sake of opposing”?

Comment by laicf | May 25, 2008

I don’t understand what is so explicit about this post.

To me, the deeds of the LEE regime are so graphic that the lurid references mentioned in your post pale in comparison.

The group of 13 bloggers including myself are campaigning for political content to be totally free, and that means abolishing certain sections of the films act and PEA.

In Singapore politics, some of the political happenings are more lurid than the sex acts mentioned.

If we can campaign for political content to be liberalized, what is this to us?

Defamation suits against truth speakers. Unconstitutional arrests of people exercising their rights. Police warnings and investigations on innocent folk who are merely speaking up for themselves. Aren’t these cowardly acts more vulgar than the sex actions mentioned in your post?

If you say PG16 on your post, I say PG13 on the PAP itself, for they are more vulgar than any prostitute I have cum across, and believe me I have been there and done that.

Comment by ngejay | May 25, 2008

No problem, Ti Lik, I’d be happy to help.

E-Jay, your observation is correct. The local political scenes here are most unnatural and appalling than sex. I would on the other hand rate the whites RA21 to restrict the young from viewing them and getting tainted by their mindless and papish-style logics.

Comment by phew! | May 27, 2008