Friday, July 31, 2009


peasants are SUCKed & FUCKed dry by a monopolised biz to SERVE A NATION TO SUCK PEASANTS DRY!


SMRT's Q1 up 19.6% to S$48.2m on higher operating profits
By Yasmine Yahya, Channel NewsAsia | Posted: 31 July 2009 1734 hrs


Photos 1 of 1

SINGAPORE: Transport operator SMRT said its first quarter net profit rose 19.6 per cent to S$48.2 million, due mainly to higher operating profits.

Revenue for the three months to June was marginally lower at about S$216 million.

SMRT said the fall was due to the fare reduction package which took effect in April, and a smaller average hired-out fleet for taxis.

SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa said the firm's profitability will be affected by the continuing volatility in diesel prices, the fare reduction package, and the ramp-up costs for the progressive opening of the remaining Circle Line stations.

But she added that SMRT will continue to grow its businesses locally and overseas while leveraging on its expertise and technology to keep costs low.

i am confused! why does the sgp gov allow SMRT, a monopolised biz to profiteer so much from SERVING A NATION TO SUCK THE PEASANTS DRY??

it's a public transport. it's a monopoly. and in the first place it should NOT be approved to be publicly listed cos it's a MONOPLY TO SERVE A NATION TO SUCK THE PEASANTS DRY

million $ lim suay suay and his $1 for 12 items cock talk



if that's not a bargain, peasants gotta do better and maybe increased it to $1 and WORK TO YOUR BONE ....and of course with drastic pay cuts. but please, public transports, education, PUB...etc would still be increased.

how u expect to pay for our minitoots's obscene million$?

wait. u cannot do $1 for 12 items?? ok no problem! the FTs can - $1 for 24 items at half of the price u are paid for. eat that, peasants!!


After economy recovers, 10 workers should do the work of 11 or 12 – Lim Swee Say
Saturday, 1 August 2009, 10:02 am | 256 views


From the Straits Times:

THE productivity of workers in Singapore is declining and labour chief Lim Swee Say has a suggestion on how companies can help turn it around. It is by doing more to develop new markets for their products.

He made the call to companies on Friday in response to feedback from many of them that measures like the Jobs Credit wage subsidy scheme are to be blamed.

Such government aid has resulted in these companies holding on to more workers than they need. They had noted that when 10 workers are retained to do the job of eight or nine workers, short-term productivity suffers.

Mr Lim, however, felt that the Government was doing the right thing by introducing help measures to save jobs.

To get around the short-term impact on labour productivity, which is a measure of the output per worker, he urged companies to ‘find ways to prepare these 10 workers, so that by the time the upturn comes, (they) can produce the output of 11 to 12 workers’.

babies are GOD's given gift of LOVE

let's ANALyse this abortion - FR from an aborted foetus

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

this story is also a very sad one. a young couple dying for a baby try all their best but it was futile....

a lovely young couple who's the wife baby making machinery is not functioning optimum hope to make a baby nightly. the love, the passion and the orgasms are super except the womb is just too weak to hold on to a developing foetus. it ends up still death.

reluctantly both the husby n wifey consulted a gynaecologist. the late prof ratnam suggested articificial implant of fertilised eggs into the wifey's womb. for the days to follow, all went well. an ultrasonic scan revealed triplets.

then the worst happened.....the womb was just too weak to continue supporting the life form. one day, the wifey was rudely awaken to find that she was bleeding down there.

liao! habis!!...she was rushed to the hospital where the doctor certified that none of the triplets foetuses could be saved. they had to be aborted as they were already still dead.

with tears of river flowing from the heart-wrenched wifey, she had no choice but to accede to the doctor's suggestion to have the dead foetuses aborted.

the next worst heart breaking news was revealed to the loving young couple. after the abortion, the wifey would be deemed to be barren. she couldn't bear any more baby.

sad...but true story that is happening to such nice kind couple.

and we witnessed laukuaybu degradingly calling her children TOU YOU PIN just for the sake of appeasing her lustful nature.

GOD shouldn't ve given her children. He should have given her chlamydia instead or some kind of other STDs for the terrible sins committed to so many.

let's ANALyse this abortion - FR from an aborted foetus

actually why would a married troll with kids got herself mixed up with someone's husband and caused the abortion of an innocent foetus?

maybe, mommy was too depressed over the illicit liaison about her own husband paying more attention to a laukuaybu troll instead of caring and concern for his unborn baby.

pre-natal pregnant woman if put in such depressive state would go to the very extreme. either the foetus would abort itself or she kills it herself through forced abortion.

the depressed mommy filed for divorce and helplessly aborted her foetus to alleviate future complication to her youthful life.

it's a scar that may not heal with time. then again, where is the conscience of the laukuaybu troll and the unfaithful husband? can they live with that guilt of being the accomplices of murdering an unborn child?

if they can, go ahead vote for them.

and then again, someone is trying to defend furiously about this real-life drama...and he speaks for "human rights, free speeches & democrapsy"....

where then is the HUMAN RIGHTS FOR UNBORN BABIES BEING KILLED THIS WAY?

the troll abandon her own loving husband, deserted her own children and called them TOU YOU PIN and merrily flirted with the unfaithful baby killer husband. now she is quite neglected but it was a good opportunity for another stupid idiot standing by to replace the hopeless unfaithful husband.

if u read until here, u should know that why someone is getting very very kan cheong already.

another abortion soon? this time from the laukuaybu troll, maybe?

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

some fishy fishy between an aide and botak??

Shi Ming Yi's personal aide tells court that most purchases on his supplementary credit cards were made on behalf of his friends
By Vivien Chan

July 29, 2009





THEY co-owned a luxurious penthouse apartment in Melbourne.
SPEND THRIFT: Raymond Yeung exceeded the credit limits on two of Shi Ming Yi's cards. PICTURE: THE STRAITS TIMES
An advertisement to sell the home described it as such: 'Beautifully designed whole floor penthouse apartment. Huge open plan living and dining room overlooking large outdoor entertaining terrace.

'Fabulous kitchen and separate casual meals area. Excellent sized master bedroom with dressing room and suite with spa opening to outdoor terrace.'

It also boasted lift access from the garage which could park at least three cars, ample storage, full security, and two more bedrooms.

These details came tumbling out yesterday, as Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) David Chew read out the ad on day 10 of the 14-day trial of former Ren Ci Hospital chief Shi Ming Yi and his ex-personal aide, Raymond Yeung, an Australian citizen who's a Singapore permanent resident.

The home in Melbourne was valued at $1.4 million.

Mr Chew reminded Yeung: 'There is a tramway in front of the building, it leads down into the pub area, the Yarra river.'

A choice location, said the DPP.

Talk of this home made many in the courtroom sit up.

Earlier, some had started to nod off as Yeung's lawyer, Mr Ng Lip Chih, went through almost four years of Yeung's credit card statements line by line.

It was a tedious process.

Even Ming Yi, 47, whose real name is Goh Kah Heng, kept his head bowed and closed his eyes during yesterday's proceedings.

Yeung, 34, had three supplementary cards given to him by Ming Yi, but he told the court yesterday that the majority of expenses on those cards were not his.

His frequent answer when his lawyer went through the statements for more than an hour?

'Not mine,' the soft-spoken and boyish-looking former air steward with Cathay Pacific would say in Cantonese through an interpreter.

Then whose?

Yeung, 34, said that many of the signings, ranging from airline bookings, hotel stays to restaurant meals, were made 'on behalf of friends', Foo Hai Ch'an Monastery, Shi Ming Yi, and as 'official expenses'.

When asked about a few signings at a local sports shop, he said: 'Venerable would usually buy some sports equipment.'

'When you talk about buying clothes, et cetera, those are mine,' he added.

Other personal expenses revealed his much-talked-about penchant for designer goods.

He visited Gucci in Tokyo and Bangkok, Omega and Ermenegildo Zegna in Bangkok, and Hugo Boss in Melbourne. He also made purchases at Prada.

Each time, he spent more than $1,000, going up to almost $5,000 sometimes.

His monthly salary at Ren Ci was $4,700.

He even exceeded the credit limits on two of Shi's cards, which were limited to $33,000 and $43,800.

Mr Chew asked: 'Does the Venerable know that you're spending so much money on branded items, like Burberry, Prada, Gucci, Hugo Boss?'

Yeung replied yes and said that Ming Yi told him to 'spend less, not to be so spendthrift'.

But Yeung admitted that he did not heed the advice.

For the items he bought on behalf of friends, he said that he would keep a record of the expenses, and his friends would repay him immediately.

Mr Chew asked Yeung in his cross-examination: 'So you're incurring credit for your friends on Venerable Shi's card.

'Did the Venerable know about this, that you were extending credit to your friends?'

'No, I did not tell him,' replied Yeung.

Kept track

Mr Chew later asked him how he could have kept track of so many payments but could forget to record the $50,000 loan by Ren Ci to Mandala Buddhist Cultural Centre, a shop that sells Buddhist artefacts, which Yeung ran.

Mr Chew said: 'You could remember all these minute transactions over the years but you forgot the $50,000 payment until Ernst and Young came into the picture.'

Yeung replied: 'I did not forget. I did not have the intention not to pay back. I admitted during the CAD (Commercial Affairs Department) interview that it's my fault not to pay back the $50,000 progressively.

'I've always wanted to pay back in a lump sum.'

Earlier yesterday, Yeung admitted: 'When Ernst and Young discovered that the $50,000 was not recorded in Mandala's book, I just wanted to quickly pay back and hope that nothing happens.'

But after he made full repayment in early 2007, he became fearful when the auditors continued asking him about it.

'I could not have handled it on my own,' he said repeatedly.

That was why he told Ming Yi to repeat the same story - that the money was used to purchase wood - if anyone asked.

'I hoped Venerable would help me,' he said.

He added: 'Frankly, if I really wanted to steal or cheat Ren Ci's money, there are many ways, such as the charity show which commenced in 2003.

'During the annual charity show, the finance department would always hand me the money for the foreign artistes' red packets.

'After we give the red packets to the artistes, they'd re-donate to Ren Ci hospital.'

Yeung said that he was the one who would prepare the red packets.

'I've never taken a single cent,' he said.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ABOUT THE CASE

MING Yi faces 10 charges of fraud, forgery and misappropriating $350,000.

He is accused of providing false or misleading information to the Commissioner of Charities, conspiracy to falsify a payment voucher and the misappropriation of Ren Ci funds.

One charge is that he gave Yeung an unauthorised $50,000 loan on 17 May 2004 to pay for the renovation of Yeung's Hong Kong flat.


Yeung has been charged with conspiring to forge a Ren Ci document and giving false information to the Commissioner of Charities.

禽兽都 不如

yep! it's worst than killing the innocent.

babies are god's given gift to a process of LOVE. killing them mercilessly, irresponsibly and painfully is 禽兽都 不如......they are defenceless human beings.

the babies murderers are 禽兽都不 如.... 不是人!!

honey, my grand auntie din come today...how?

now for the 3rd abortion story....

"honey, jialat liao!!" panic a bitchy troll. "honey, u hear what i said or not?"

lover: simi dai ji!! so early u kow peh cow bu for fuck!!

b t: my grand auntie din come today u know....chum leh!! she comes every month...this time no cum how??

lover: just phone her and ask her to get her butts over lor...dun disturb leh...last night u drain all my juices oredi...no more battery dear...let me sleep.

siao liao!! another murder in the making......

a year later....

another morning, another repeat of last year drama: MY GRAND AUNTIE DIN COME AGAIN....HOW???

and u won't believe it. the next year, it happens again. all in, this bitchy troll had murdered 3 unborn foetuses but she wasn't convicted or hanged.

i bet next year she would yell again:

DEAR, MY GRAND AUNTIE DIN COME....YES, AGAIN!! HOW HUH? HOW LEH?:p

alamak!! apologies to all the ladies. pai seh!! we left our the horny machoman who has much to blame too.

WHY HE DIN DON A CONDOM?

probable reasons:

1. too cheapskate to buy
2. more intense sensation
3. impromptu feeling or horniess and throw everything to the wind
4. just being stupid and irresponsible.

go ahead. ANALYse the scenario.

ANALysis time.

WHY MOMMY? WHY??......this time, our aborted foetus in spiritual realm began to question this too: WHY DADDY? WHY? WHY DIN U DON AN UMBRELLA? CONDOM SO EXPENSIVE MEH??

ANALYsis time:

who is or are the murderer(s)?
1. the mistress who's mommy's good pal
2. the daddy
3. mommy dear
4. ALL OF THEM.