look at what this forummer just found and revealed....tsk..tsk...and she still wanna lie further...^head shaking*
Coffee Shop Talk - Confimed: I was banned by Lamei
From: kojakbt22 06:06
To: ALL 1 of 9
172747.1
Dear bros,
I have just received a reply from Walk Howe of Delphiforums (tos@delphiforums.com). See below.
This has confirmed my suspicion all along that Lamei is the person behind my ban. The only pic I posted before getting banned is the one about Lamei (aka Go Hui Leng) holding one kid and carrying another participating in the SDP protest. There were no other pics. I can attest to this.
This also helps in some way to confirm some of the stories revealed by a forumer here that the so-called "F4" is behind a series of banning. If this Lamei went to complain against me for posting a public picture, what about all the other people who have been "quarreling" with her? It's extremely likely that I'm not her first and last case (I don't know about the rest, so I can only speak from whatever evidence I have on hand now). So, it's reasonable to assume that I'm not alone and that She (or her gang) must have banned others too.
Another interesting revelation is this. Walt Howe said, "avoid participating in attacks on other members".... what does this mean? I need help from you guys out there to find out the details of the Forum terms and conditions. Heck, from day 1 when SBF is in operation, everyday everyone is attacking someone! What kind of attacks is ok, and what kind is not? We must establish some ground rules. The word "ATTACK" is just too broad.
Cause if you want to define ATTACK very narrowly, then anytime you call Lamei names, that would be an attack. Anytime you say she is not a responsible mother who bring kids to protest, that's another attack. And if her complaint is entertained, what about the rest of the people? Then any minute infringement on say a person X, he can also follow Lamei's example and go complain. I tell u bros, if we allow this to happen, this FORUM will die cause this whole place would become like communist China in cultural revolution or the Resign of Terror in the French Revolution when any slight infringement would be reported to the authorities! This is even worse than STOMP! And if this FORUM dies, it's harder to start another like SBF again which has grown in stature with rich history. I dare say this, it would be a loss to Singapore and Singaporeans if SBF dies.
So BROTHERS, we must fight back. What I intend to do is this. Now that I have gotten the attention of Walt Howe, I would like to engage him further. My writings is not very good. I would like to start this thread here so that we can all compose a letter to Walt Howe to better define the terms and conditions of banning people here. The one word "ATTACK" is just too broad. Finally, pls submit in your email addr or nicks (I think email addr better cause it carrys more weight) to jointly submit this letter to Walt Howe. We need to put an end to this indiscriminate banning that's going on (esp I suspect it's only a few of these crying babies who are crying out for banning others they don't agree with).
For those of you who dont wish to reveal yourselves here publicly (for fear that you would be targeted by er... u know who, you can email me kojakbt@gmail.com.
- kojakbt -
___________________________________________________________________
Walt Howe to me
show details 1:22 am (10 hours ago)
I re-opened your kodakbt22 account. In return, I expect you to avoid participating in attacks on other members or posting pictures that are not yours.
Walt Howe
Terms of Service Office
Delphi Forums
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
PART 2 OF THE TROLLING FISHMONGER'S WIFE
there she goes again....putting up more craps...FRESH LIVE CRAPS as usual in sbf forum about mata (policemen) visting her flat. well, let's hear what's her la kopi tale with the matas....
Coffee Shop Talk - 2nd Rejected Letter to ST - 15/3 Protest
From: 邪不能胜正 (LaMei) 02:26
To: ALL 1 of 9
172730.1
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:48:20 +0800 (CST)
Subject: Letter to the Forum with regards to Police Intimidation
To: stforum@sph.com.sg
I was a participant in the 15 March 2008 protest organized by SDP along with two of my young children.
On 20th March 2008, at about 9.45pm, while trying to put my two tired kids to sleep, a loud bang on my door jolted them up.
At the door, I was greeted by two non-uniformed police officers who identified themselves and told me that I was under investigation for participating in an illegal assembly and procession.
My questions are:
1) Since they could identify me as one of the protesters, I am sure they are well aware that I have two young children. Did they need to bang on my door so hard? Yes, my door bell is not working, but my ears are. I am certainly not deaf!
2) Is this police way of intimidating citizens who are not afraid of exercising their constitutional rights to participate in a peaceful protest?
3) Do the police want my young children to see them as intimidating figures rather than as "friendly neighborhood policemen", as they like to market themselves to be?
4) What has become of our society if even speaking up is a crime, citizen are being intimidated for doing so, and yet limping terrorists are out on the loose?
只许州官放火，不许百姓点灯！
maybe she should also mention, the matas drooled at her. what were they thinking of?!! bak kut teh tonight in balestier? or thank god! my mother, sister, gf or wife is not like this old bragging noisy laukubuay!
notice: she didn't dare to put up her REAL name. such a braggard!!
Coffee Shop Talk - 2nd Rejected Letter to ST - 15/3 Protest
From: 邪不能胜正 (LaMei) 02:26
To: ALL 1 of 9
172730.1
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:48:20 +0800 (CST)
Subject: Letter to the Forum with regards to Police Intimidation
To: stforum@sph.com.sg
I was a participant in the 15 March 2008 protest organized by SDP along with two of my young children.
On 20th March 2008, at about 9.45pm, while trying to put my two tired kids to sleep, a loud bang on my door jolted them up.
At the door, I was greeted by two non-uniformed police officers who identified themselves and told me that I was under investigation for participating in an illegal assembly and procession.
My questions are:
1) Since they could identify me as one of the protesters, I am sure they are well aware that I have two young children. Did they need to bang on my door so hard? Yes, my door bell is not working, but my ears are. I am certainly not deaf!
2) Is this police way of intimidating citizens who are not afraid of exercising their constitutional rights to participate in a peaceful protest?
3) Do the police want my young children to see them as intimidating figures rather than as "friendly neighborhood policemen", as they like to market themselves to be?
4) What has become of our society if even speaking up is a crime, citizen are being intimidated for doing so, and yet limping terrorists are out on the loose?
只许州官放火，不许百姓点灯！
maybe she should also mention, the matas drooled at her. what were they thinking of?!! bak kut teh tonight in balestier? or thank god! my mother, sister, gf or wife is not like this old bragging noisy laukubuay!
notice: she didn't dare to put up her REAL name. such a braggard!!
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
protest that was just a disguise
From: CaringWife 23:20
To: 邪不能胜正 (LaMei) unread 413 of 415
171784.413 in reply to 171784.1
Letter to The Straits Times Forum:
20 Mar 08
I refer to the peaceful protest by SDP held on 15 March 2008.
I got to know about the protest through word of mouth and decided to exercise my constitutional rights as a Singapore Citizen by participating together with my two young children. My purpose was simple: to highlight the rising cost of living that is affecting me and my family.
Recent increases in childcare costs, milk powder, transportation and medical costs, are taking a toll on families like me with very young dependents.
What started out as a peaceful protest turned unnecessarily rowdy in the end because the police held up the group of protesters outside Funan Digimall and prevented them from moving.
The police intervention created a scene that attracted big crowds of passersby.
As a Citizen who is non-partisan, I will support causes I believe in, regardless of who the organizers are. In times of price hikes where we were told by our ministers to buy house brand bread, eat frozen meat, I do not think I have the spare cash to enjoy the luxury of junk foods. It's World Consumer Day on 15 March 2008, so what is wrong with protesting about the recent escalating price hikes?
What has become of our society if even speaking up has become a crime, and peaceful protests end up with arrest, yet limping terrorists are out on the loose?
Go Hui Leng
http://singaporedemocrat.org/articleWCRDprotest23.html
this is the notorius LAMEI who's always posting her kind of craps in sammyboy's coffeeshop. she was so bloody proud that she brought her kids , her teletubbies to attend some silly childish protest held by SDP. i wonder if chiatilik wasn't involved, would she be still so keen?
the increase of consumers' prices especially food is a WHOLE WIDE PHENOMENON. those idiots who were protesting were simply too ignorant and way too detached from reality. there were about 30 ding protestors there. that's maybe including kids they brought along. such irresponsible parents who brought their kids to protest really have to be charged for putting them in such a risk of being hurt should the whole scene turned raucous and ugly. Yet this mother of all thing could still brag that she wanted her kids to be "politically aware" while still sucking their pacifiers.
WHAT A LOAD OF CRAPS!!
those kids might to taught to disregard the laws and that when police were arresting the protestors, the police were WRONG. how would these kids later grow up to be? lawless??
very sad .... that parents because of their personal waywardness are inculcating such moral into young innocent minds.
To: 邪不能胜正 (LaMei) unread 413 of 415
171784.413 in reply to 171784.1
Letter to The Straits Times Forum:
20 Mar 08
I refer to the peaceful protest by SDP held on 15 March 2008.
I got to know about the protest through word of mouth and decided to exercise my constitutional rights as a Singapore Citizen by participating together with my two young children. My purpose was simple: to highlight the rising cost of living that is affecting me and my family.
Recent increases in childcare costs, milk powder, transportation and medical costs, are taking a toll on families like me with very young dependents.
What started out as a peaceful protest turned unnecessarily rowdy in the end because the police held up the group of protesters outside Funan Digimall and prevented them from moving.
The police intervention created a scene that attracted big crowds of passersby.
As a Citizen who is non-partisan, I will support causes I believe in, regardless of who the organizers are. In times of price hikes where we were told by our ministers to buy house brand bread, eat frozen meat, I do not think I have the spare cash to enjoy the luxury of junk foods. It's World Consumer Day on 15 March 2008, so what is wrong with protesting about the recent escalating price hikes?
What has become of our society if even speaking up has become a crime, and peaceful protests end up with arrest, yet limping terrorists are out on the loose?
Go Hui Leng
http://singaporedemocrat.org/articleWCRDprotest23.html
this is the notorius LAMEI who's always posting her kind of craps in sammyboy's coffeeshop. she was so bloody proud that she brought her kids , her teletubbies to attend some silly childish protest held by SDP. i wonder if chiatilik wasn't involved, would she be still so keen?
the increase of consumers' prices especially food is a WHOLE WIDE PHENOMENON. those idiots who were protesting were simply too ignorant and way too detached from reality. there were about 30 ding protestors there. that's maybe including kids they brought along. such irresponsible parents who brought their kids to protest really have to be charged for putting them in such a risk of being hurt should the whole scene turned raucous and ugly. Yet this mother of all thing could still brag that she wanted her kids to be "politically aware" while still sucking their pacifiers.
WHAT A LOAD OF CRAPS!!
those kids might to taught to disregard the laws and that when police were arresting the protestors, the police were WRONG. how would these kids later grow up to be? lawless??
very sad .... that parents because of their personal waywardness are inculcating such moral into young innocent minds.
Sunday, March 23, 2008
MASS ORGASM: EMPTINESS IS FORM, FORM IS EMPTINESS....
this is an interesting thread. it's very subjective. if u believe, u will think the 'holy spirit' is with u. if u dun or to the bystanders or non believers, it appears like the masses were being possessed or hypnotised NOT by the Holy Spirit but by the power of principality.
so what's your view here? God's HOLY SPIRIT or satan's hooleey spirit?
in the buddhist text, it would simply be:
EMPTINESS IS FORM....FORM IS EMPTINESS....
man creates the form, indulges in the form and finally get so attached into the 'form' that he originally created....
Coffee Shop Talk - MASS ORGASM @ CHC
From: Zenith In Romance: Hiroko Kasahara (ZiRhK) 21-Mar 23:58
To: ALL 1 of 35
171595.1
CHC ORGY: I WANT TO CUM... (Mass Orgasm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9IV8bS80ZQ
Can anyone confirm how often CHC goers are given this MASS ORGASM party??
I mean, just look at their faces!! Kong Hee Fatt Choy is probably looking too, and thinking to himself, "Just look at how happily they are being fucked by me..."
so what's your view here? God's HOLY SPIRIT or satan's hooleey spirit?
in the buddhist text, it would simply be:
EMPTINESS IS FORM....FORM IS EMPTINESS....
man creates the form, indulges in the form and finally get so attached into the 'form' that he originally created....
Coffee Shop Talk - MASS ORGASM @ CHC
From: Zenith In Romance: Hiroko Kasahara (ZiRhK) 21-Mar 23:58
To: ALL 1 of 35
171595.1
CHC ORGY: I WANT TO CUM... (Mass Orgasm)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9IV8bS80ZQ
Can anyone confirm how often CHC goers are given this MASS ORGASM party??
I mean, just look at their faces!! Kong Hee Fatt Choy is probably looking too, and thinking to himself, "Just look at how happily they are being fucked by me..."
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
15 mar '08, SDP PROTEST at PARLIAMENT HOUSE
what was the protest all about? was it really for the citizens? was it really against consumers price increases? or was it another ploy to embarrass the gov and the country?
it was a suppose to be a 'peaceful' protest. even kids were brought there to participate. now take a look at this videoclip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMD2-SjsKGM
it was a suppose to be a 'peaceful' protest. even kids were brought there to participate. now take a look at this videoclip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMD2-SjsKGM
Saturday, March 15, 2008
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
